The encyclical contrasts AI-driven technocracy with human dignity, proposing shared responsibility over efficiency, and aligning with EU AI law in setting limits to protect the common good.
Law 49/2026 defines strict limits on energy telemarketing, detailing scope, exemptions, enforcement and consent rules, and strengthening consumer protection and operator liability.
Law 49/2026 introduces a ban on unsolicited energy telemarketing, strengthening consumer protection, privacy safeguards and sanctions, and pushing firms toward user-consented contact methods.
The CJEU’s Russmedia Digital ruling limits platforms’ reliance on technical neutrality, emphasizing accountability by design and greater responsibility for foreseeable data protection risks.
The AI Act introduces the FRIA, requiring deployers of high-risk AI to assess impacts on fundamental rights beyond data protection, analyzing context, risks, and affected groups as part of risk-based AI governance.
Guidelines outline a six-phase roadmap for companies, especially SMEs, to adopt AI safely: assess readiness, plan governance, test via pilots, scale gradually, monitor risks continuously, and invest in upskilling and reskilling.
GPAI are broad AI models, LLMs are a tech subset, and Agentic AI uses LLMs autonomously; distinctions help navigate AI Act rules and guide safe, informed organizational adoption.
Italy adopts non-binding AI workplace guidelines to support SMEs and self-employed workers, ensuring human-centric, safe AI use aligned with EU AI Act and national Law 132/2025.
From the 1997 BNL case to CJEU C-422/24, privacy law stresses individualized, timely notice. Misapplying Articles 13 and 14 GDPR risks sanctions and covert surveillance concerns.
The AI Act places strict duties on deployers for managing serious incidents, with rapid reporting to authorities. Transparency, proper data and logging are key to avoiding legal and ethical risks.
Via Cremignone 4B – 6924 Sorengo
info@dataismimperiali.com